Interactive Writing: Reaction to “A Book is a Start-Up”

Step right up, ladies and gents, and buy this load of crap! Photo credit: Sumi-l / / CC BY-NC-SA

Step right up, ladies and gents, and buy this load of crap!
Photo credit: Sumi-l / / CC BY-NC-SA

Last week, The New Yorker published “A Book Is a Start-Up: Lessons from Leanpub, NetMinds, and Other Publishing Hustlers.

Basically, the article contends that the e-publishing phenomenon is changing the author/reader relationship–but not in the way we often hear (the “cutting out the middleman publishers” way, that is). No, this article cites several new-wave publishers who want the reader to be able to directly interact with the writer as the writing is happening.

Woah, what?

The idea is that a writer should let readers–with all their interests, editing abilities, and potential future buying power–get involved from day one. No more should the writer complete his first draft “behind closed doors” (as Stephen King suggests); no, let the reader get all up in your biz-nas, because it’s good for business.

“We believe a writer is not necessarily a writer,” Sanders, the Net Minds C.E.O., said. “They are content containers.” At the Net Minds website, freelancers can sign up as writers or ghostwriters, as well as editors, copyreaders, designers, and publicists. The writer, then, arrives with a thought, for manufacture. The mechanics of book start-ups suggest an assembly line at times…

Good for you, I guess, if that appeals to you, but I think it is dead wrong. I am more than just a “container,” thankyouverymuch. Crowd-sourcing has produced some great things–look at Wikipedia, for example!–but it also creates a lot of horrible things–look at Wikipedia, for example! I mean, you only need to glance at Yahoo!Answers to get a sense that a whole lotta people don’t have sufficient grasp of the English language to reliably call others out on their mistakes.

Maybe special-interest books like business guides can be crowdsourced in that way (the business/marketing books for industry that I’ve read are all pretty much interchangeable anyway), but I think this kind of writing/editing fusion is pure snake oil. It can’t be good.

I’ll be with Mr. King, writing privately with the door closed, thanks.


Filed under writing

6 responses to “Interactive Writing: Reaction to “A Book is a Start-Up”

  1. I can’t see this being a good idea, myself. If I were a professional author I would feel quite uneasy about putting my work out to the public in anything less than a finished state.

    I’ve found from my (limited) experience that it’s better keep the first draft of a novel completely private: it makes the whole process feel a lot less pressured, aside from everything else.

  2. I like fried eggs, but that doesn’t mean I want to watch the chicken lay them.

  3. Scary concept! And a horrible idea. Running with the food analogy, sausage comes to mind here. My mom tried to make sausage once. Not only was I scarred for life by the “how & what” but it also tasted horrible. Sometimes, you really do need to know what you’re doing.

    Thanks for the post and the article link.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s