Tag Archives: books

Review: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-TimeThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A lot of the time when we talk about writing, we say it’s because we “want to get into someone else’s head.”

But that’s not true, is it? A lot of the time, we want to be ourselves, but in someone else’s life. You want to stop being a truck driver who takes the same route to work every day, day after day, and be a prince fighting faeries instead; you want to not be a frazzled mother of three young kids and instead be a footloose woman who can pick up and find herself in countries totally different from your real world; you want to not be a lost teenager in a scary world with things out of your control, because you’d rather be a boy wizard who has amazing friends and literally saves the world.

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time is a rare book that literally puts you inside someone else’s mind. And it’s incredibly disorienting at first, but all the more powerful for this transformation.

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time is a story about a deeply autistic boy, Christopher, who discovers his neighbor’s dog is dead and decides to be a detective like the Sherlock Holmes stories he likes to read, and he writes down everything that happens in a book he began making as a class assignment.

Because he is autistic (and because author Mark Haddon is very good at what he does and has worked with special needs kids), Christopher’s writings are not like anything else. There’s very little emotion, not much introspection. There are math problems. Chapters are numbered with sequential prime numbers. There are very precise drawings of the patterns of the fabric of a new chair.

The presumably non-autistic reader is left to fill in a lot of the gaps in the story, because while Christopher is perhaps the most literal narrator in some senses (describing even the number of holes in someone’s shoe, and the exact color of the beans on the plate), his perceptual lapses means he truly can’t understand some things. But the reader can, making this book a lot more interactive between the character and the reader than most.

It’s hard to relate directly to Christopher, and that’s what makes this book so compelling. You see through his eyes and are frustrated that he misinterprets information that seems so obvious. The people all around him–even his pet rat sometimes!–are more like the reader than Christopher, and you feel their frustration with dealing with Christopher’s many needs, with his seeming dichotomy between a kid who is stunning at some things and completely empty in others.

It’s a lesson in empathy, if nothing else.

This book isn’t an easy read, and it’s not a happy read, either, and I’m mystified by the quotes on the cover exclaiming the “bleak humor” within, because I found nothing funny–just sad. Because as more children are diagnosed with autism and society finds ways to cope, much of what happens in the book is barely fiction for many parents and teachers and caregivers. I can’t imagine the pain it must cause those real parents who have to find strategies to manage real Christophers.

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time is a fantastically written book, but be prepared for something a bit more weighty than your average fare.

View all my reviews

4 Comments

Filed under Reviews

Review: All There Is; Love Stories from StoryCorps

All There Is: Love Stories from StoryCorpsAll There Is: Love Stories from StoryCorps by Dave Isay

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I am not a crier by nature. The Notebook didn’t make me cry; though I do always get a lip quiver when I watch Moulin Rouge, I don’t cry; and I don’t typically read a book or watch a movie with the intent that it’ll evoke some strong emotion.

So when I say that I have found the book I’ll keep handy in the event I’ll ever join a soap opera and need to sob on demand, know that means something.

All There Is: Love Stories from StoryCorps can make me cry in two pages. Not gentle tears, but complete face-twisting uninhibited emotion. And you should absolutely read it.

All There Is is a compilation of true stories collected by StoryCorps as part of their mission to collect stories of people’s lives. These will be given to the storyteller as a family keepsake and another copy goes to the Library of Congress, to pass on to future Americans. It’s a simple mission, but incredibly powerful. If you’ve never heard StoryCorps on the radio, go watch this animated version. It’s one of the stories in the book, but it’s a little different to see it. Go watch right now.

I don’t think this book is necessarily supposed to be sad. The first section is all about finding love, and the stories are all happy endings, and you can practically hear the giggles in the narrators’ voices as they describe their first dates with the people they spend their whole lives with. It’s charming and so authentic, though, it strikes a chord on your heartstrings like nothing else. It makes you believe in true love.

The second segment is about love lost, and that one packs a definite wallop. In fact, my fiance took the book away from me, because by the third story in, I was clutching him and crying uncontrollably. So, to be completely honest, I haven’t read the whole book–yet. I’m going to need to space it out, because this book is so moving it needs to be taken in small doses.

The final section is on love found again. If it’s anything like the first two, I’ll need the tissues handy.

This is no Chicken Soup for the Soul. No, All There Is is your favorite Chicken Soup story turned to 1000. It’s so raw and heartfelt and emotional, so matter-of-fact, so inherently inspirational and compelling, that I promise it will be like nothing else you’ve ever read.

Even if you’re not a crier and can’t bring yourself to read something that’s going to clear out your tear ducts, I recommend you buy this book, to support StoryCorps in their mission. Or donate to their cause.

It’s money well spent.

View all my reviews

Leave a comment

Filed under Reviews

Review: The Black Unicorn

The Black Unicorn (Magic Kingdom of Landover, #2)The Black Unicorn by Terry Brooks

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Used book stores are amazing places, but they can lead to book-mania.
I blame the irrationality of book-mania for this book. It was in the clearance section (of Half Price Books! Even more cheap!), and I hadn’t read anything pure fantasy in awhile, and honestly it has a picture of a unicorn on the cover, so yeah, I bought it.
I realized about a third of the way through that I’d made a mistake, but I kept going–surely it will get better any time now.
It didn’t.
First, this is a sequel, but I’ve not read the first book in the series (oops), because I didn’t realize it was a No. 2 until after it was too late. So I didn’t know what was going on at first. Things eventually were kind of revealed, but…this plot needs work. Terry Brooks was clearly going for some kind of “know thyself” message, but it was really muddled. This was one of the rare books that I honestly thought would have been better if the main character had switched with the secondary character: that is, rather than mostly following lead character Ben Holiday, I kept wishing I could drag the perspective away and see what Willow, the tree-girl/sylph, was up to. Because while Ben spends the majority of the book totally lost and aimless, Willow has purpose. She may not know WHY she’s doing something, but she knows she should (oh the “my fairy magic told me so” excuse).
It was particularly upsetting when the BIG REVEAL made it up to Ben to suddenly know everything, when the reader knows Ben is completely clueless. It was like Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgemont High suddenly became Sherlock Holmes. There was just NO WAY.
Also, it’s probably a bad idea to have one of your characters declare he’s not a deux ex machina. Odds are if he says he isn’t, the magical mysterious cat-like-fairy-creature doth protest too much.
Anyway, I’m relieved to be moving on from this one.

View all my reviews

2 Comments

Filed under Reviews

Review: Sharpe’s Tiger

Sharpe's Tiger (Sharpe, #1)Sharpe’s Tiger by Bernard Cornwell

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This was not the right book for me. I read it out of family loyalty, honestly. It wasn’t poorly written–in fact, it’s a great example of really detailed historical fiction, and that’s impressive–but I just did not care. I tried, I really did, but this book was a very strong “meh” for me.

Private Richard “Dick” Sharpe is in the British army in 1799, fighting a war he doesn’t really understand or have any genuine interest in at all. In fact, he’s considering deserting, because the army is “boring.”
It quickly becomes less boring as he’s set up for assaulting an officer (who really really deserved that punch) and nearly dies thanks to the British “correctional” plan of flogging a man for any crime under the sun. But Sharpe is snatched from the jaws of horrible death by happenstance and a problem that needs a regular man with a bit of wit about him–sneaking in to the enemy Indian city to rescue, or at least take a message from, the captured officer inside.
I won’t give much more away, but of course Sharpe becomes the day’s hero and all is concluded with everyone but the enemy better off than he was before.
You’ll need an interest in military maneuvers for this book to work for you. I thought it was enough to like history, but no, this is a military history book above all else. It comes close to giving Sharpe the daring-do of Clive Cussler’s Dirk Pitt, but falls short, and though he’s clever, Sharpe is also common, so he’s no James Bond either. It’s refreshing, in a way, that the hero is far more average than most action books, but…for me, that also left him rather boring. He doesn’t so much as act as react to his surroundings, and though he does it remarkably well, I struggled to stay interested in this one.

Do give it a shot if you like reading detailed explanations of old fights, though.

View all my reviews

Leave a comment

Filed under Reviews

What Good is Reading, Anyway?

I was in a group of new folks and we were forced to do one of those awful icebreakers. “Pretend you’re on a deserted island for a year and you can only bring 1 book, 1 song (?), and one practical item. The basics are supplied for you. What do you bring?”

I was astounded at the number of people in the group of seemingly educated folks who not only couldn’t pick a book, but said they couldn’t even think of a book. Didn’t even know the last book they’d read.

One guy picked The Hunger Games “because it will make me think about survival and stuff” and one woman picked “that one book I had to read in high school about kids on an island.” She meant Lord of the Flies, and was a bit surprised when we pointed out that one doesn’t end well.

(I picked The Lord of the Rings, if it makes a difference. It’s both long and incredibly re-readable, and it’s been awhile since I’ve read it all anyway.)

I was incredibly disappointed in these new not-yet-friends, and couldn’t help like feeling like Gulliver in his eponymous travels, trying to communicate with the Yahoos. Or maybe that makes me a Houyhnhnm, and I’m the one out of place.

Anyway, it got me thinking about the relative value of reading. Of course, being a writer and editor and general appreciator of the written word, I personally value it quite a lot. But if all these otherwise lovely people can’t so much as name a recent title, maybe I’m being antiquated and longing after telegrams when everyone else has moved on to this new-fangled telephone.

Unfortunately, I’ve got science on my side. There is evidence, based on research done at the University of Toronto, that reading fiction makes people better able to handle ambiguity. Basically, reading about imaginary scenarios allows you to think deeply about situations outside of your own life and consider more options than you otherwise might. It’s mind-broadening.

Personally, I feel like open-mindedness is a characteristic our modern society could use a heckuva lot more of, particularly as we are able to communicate globally and encounter people of backgrounds formerly unimaginable to us. American politics in particular seems to have grown more and more divisive; perhaps what we need is some sort of national book club. We can call it “On the Same Page.”

Additionally, I found another study quite pertinent. Reading makes us more human.

Contemplate the gravity of that statement for a moment. More human. Woah.

The idea here is that reading is one of those things that humans have managed to do that other species have not. It may even be one of the few things that truly separates us from other creatures in this world. Interpreting written works involves basic brainpower (the actual act of reading) as well as spiritual, emotional, and intellectual connections. There is a lot to offer between two covers of a book.

I find fiction–broadly including video games, movies, really good TV shows (no reality TV dreck, thankyouverymuch), and of course books–awakens part of my spirit and mind I otherwise wouldn’t have much of an outlet for. I don’t think I could go without it. In fact, I finished reading a book and realized I didn’t have another promptly cued up. I was a bit frantic until I found a new one…15 minutes later. I am literally never truly without a book, and I hope to spread my joy of reading with the icebreaking group, and with others. We–like libraries–are places of infinite potential, if only we explore.

2 Comments

Filed under writing

Review: The Disappearing Spoon

The Disappearing Spoon: And Other True Tales of Madness, Love, and the History of the World from the Periodic Table of the ElementsThe Disappearing Spoon: And Other True Tales of Madness, Love, and the History of the World from the Periodic Table of the Elements by Sam Kean

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The Disappearing Spoon is a history of the periodic table of elements.

Some of you are going “ohhh goody!” and immediately adding it to your reading lists. (Let’s be friends!)

For everyone else, who perhaps needs a little convincing, let me tell you that you should most definitely read this book if any of the below apply:
* You work in some kind (any kind, really) of scientific research field
* You enjoy nonfiction history books
* Bill Nye the Science Guy is your hero
* You really enjoy being able to dish out random facts at parties
* You like science in a vague way but didn’t like all that memorization or math stuff

The Disappearing Spoon is a feat like no other. Sam Kean needs an award for his incredible dissolution of complex scientific ideas into information the smart but non-sciencey reader can absorb–things like packing oranges in crates as an analogy for the atomic structure of tin in its alpha and beta forms. It’s complex stuff, but he kept it both scientifically accurate AND interesting. I’ve known a number of researchers… lemme tell you, that is a feat.

And Kean really did his homework. In fact, you’re going to need two bookmarks to read this one. I struggled for about half of it before getting a second one; it makes a difference. You see, this book is heavily footnoted, and you really don’t want to miss out on the extra information. Sometimes it’s just a citation, but for the most part, it’s extra information that will make you say “WOW.” So get yourself a second bookmark to hold your place in the back, too.

Kean covers every element in the table (and yes, there’s a lot) so this book, while completely fascinating, is a bit of a slog at times. It’s challenging to maintain that thread, so for the busy reader, I’d recommend making this your before-bed book (or, more scandalously, your bathroom-time book), because you’re going to put it down a lot anyway. But you do want to complete it.

You’ll learn jaw-dropping facts like:
-the disappearing spoon is a real thing
-One Nobel Prize winner was referred to as “S.D. Mother” in the newspaper when she won
-Marie Curie was better known in her day for her impropriety and turbulent personal life than for her science
-some people drink silver as a health aid…with disastrous bright-blue results
-we really are all made of the same stuff as stars
-how, exactly, some of the deadly elements kill you
-one vest was worn by three Nobel Prize winners over the years
-the first “computers” were the women who worked on the Manhattan Project, running computations long-hand
-there are people who are absolutely obsessive about kilograms

You’ll get more science in this one book than you got in a year of high school education, but it will be freshly delivered on a gleaming plate of intrigue, personalities, and incredulity. It’s well worth your time to learn more than you ever thought possible.

View all my reviews

Leave a comment

Filed under Reviews, Science

Review: “The Ocean at the End of the Lane”

The Ocean at the End of the LaneThe Ocean at the End of the Lane by Neil Gaiman

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

It’s hard to describe The Ocean at the End of the Lane without revealing spoilers. Let’s start with this: This book is unlike any other I’ve ever read. It feels somewhat like a Grimm fairy tale, and any moral is similarly absent, or at least unobtrusive. Others have described it as having a 7-year-old narrator, but that’s only partially true. It’s a challenging, contemplative, but relatively quick read.

While at his book reading/signing, Gaiman noted with approval that one reviewer had called this a “book for readers,” meaning there is no real age distinction. I’m going to have to forcefully disagree. While most of this book is fairly all-ages, the horror-tinged parts are deeply scary. I wouldn’t give it to any child under 13, and then only if they were okay with being frightened. Unlike other horrors based in fantasy that can maybe be shrugged off, this one challenges the very core of a child’s (or adult’s!) feelings of safety and security. Proceed with caution.

A summary, trying to avoid any important spoilery bits: A man goes back to his childhood home, finding it much different. But the house down the lane looks shockingly similar to his memory of it. He feels compelled to go there, and sits and stares into the pond. From this vantage point, he remembers. He remembers the frights and thrills of his seventh year of life, and the monster he accidentally awoke, and the trials he and the girl from down the lane went through to try to overcome it.

I don’t think this book is for everyone. I really deeply enjoy Gaiman, and I still didn’t always enjoy this one in bits (I should have been prepared for the level of horror, perhaps, because of Sandman, but it took me by surprised anyway). It’s obviously deeply personal, drawing from elements of Gaiman’s real childhood and real life in ways his prior books. It feels as if we’ve unlocked some secret door in Gaiman’s mind, a parallel universe door in which this story is actually truth. The descriptions are vibrant and rich, and I very much wish I could go enjoy a meal with the Hempstock matriarchs.

Though this book debuted this summer, this feels more like a book for a dark and moody winter, when you’ve long forgotten the warmth of the sun.

View all my reviews

2 Comments

Filed under Reviews

Literary Summer

This month has been epic in a rather literary way. From the last week of May until this week, I have been lucky enough to hear and meet Martha Barnette and Grant Barrett from the A Way With Words radio show, author Margaret Atwood, and author Neil Gaiman.

I think I’ve hit some kind of trifecta there. I’m not sure of what, exactly, except perhaps the Jeopardy category of “People Who Make Your Heart and Brain Go Pitter-Pat.” I love the radio show (you can listen online!) and Atwood and Gaiman are both so high in my tier of favorite authors that I’m not even sure which gets the “best” appellation. Atwood was first and perhaps more influential to my personal writing style, but Gaiman is just so prolific and varied that I always feel like I’m discovering something else new (and often scary).

A Way With Words

If you haven’t heard it yet, A Way With Words is a nationally syndicated radio show about language. They do word jokes, explain the etymology of interesting words both colloquial and professorial, and, most of all, answer word questions from callers of all stripes. They have a philosophy of verbal flexibility (meaning that it’s ok that words change meanings and spellings over time and geography) and are incredibly kind and so shockingly learned. It’s like they’ve swallowed the OED and can now regurgitate on command.

I saw them at a special benefit for the Aberg Center for Literacy, an organization I’d not heard of previously, but they are advocates for literacy and therefore I like them. I had expected the show to be mostly a real-life version of the radio hour, but the organizers had mixed it up a bit. Greg and Martha each had a talk, with a game show format in the middle. Greg discussed the ways his young son was teaching him things about language and about how forgiveness is an important part of learning (and teaching). Martha’s talk was about a professor who really taught her to love language, and who became a teacher of more than academics, but of life. It was a very moving presentation.

They took questions from the audience, and I was stunned that my question was the first drawn. But it was too good a question, and they were stumped (“Does the phrase ‘brain-child’ have anything to do with the myth of Athena, who was born from the skull of Zeus?” Answer: “We dunno. Maybe? Sounds good, let’s say yes, sure, why not?”)

The question-and-answer bit really showed how much they knew off the top of their heads; they answered questions without any resources and without having known the questions ahead of time.

Atwood signing

Margaret Atwood

The first book of Atwood’s I discovered was “A Handmaid’s Tale,” arguably her most famous because it is both required reading and banned in schools, depending on your region. It was assigned in mine, and I did perhaps the most unconventional book report on record for it. Well, at least my most unconventional. I asked my teachers if I could “act it out.” They were very obliging souls, so they said yes.

When it was my turn to present my “report” on “A Handmaid’s Tale,” I solemnly walked to the front of the class, explained that the president and Congress were dead, and I was now in charge of the class. Several classmates turned and stared at our teachers, who just shrugged and said we’d all better listen. I broke up couples, confiscated religious jewelry, separated girls from boys, explained that the girls would now be divided into groups based on their ability to procreate and that the boys, if they were lucky and loyal enough, might one day get the privilege of a wife. One classmate protested my act, and I said that was fine, and he would be hanged. I had my “bodyguard” (who had previously volunteered, and thus got himself a wife) “execute” him, and he was mock-hanged in the front of the class, as an example for the rest.

Like I said, the most bizarre book report ever. I certainly won’t ever forget it.

I’ve since read and enjoyed many other of Atwood’s books (I have a particular fondness for “Oryx and Crake” and “The Penelopiad”), but “Handmaid” was revolutionary for me. It was bleak…really really bleak. Most of even the apocalyptic stories I’d read had shown a strong light of hope. It was all the worse because it was set in such a realistic version of our world, and it scared me on a level no book ever has.

Atwood came to speak as part of a Dallas Museum of Art Arts and Letters presentation. Ostensibly she was there to talk about mythology, but she did this only tangentially. She did show us lots of pictures of her drawings, at various ages. (Apparently she is also an illustrator, and I’m crushed that the copies of her books I have aren’t those she drew).

Mostly, she talked about her childhood. She grew up in the woods of Canada, and didn’t have running water or electricity for most of her childhood. Books were of preeminent importance because they needed things to do.

I think I told my dad that night that I was now upset that we’d had water and electricity, because how would I ever be a fantastic author now?

He didn’t seem that bothered by it.

Atwood took questions from the audience, and I happened to be sitting right by the microphone, so I leapt up and asked about her feelings on technology. She gave a very lovely and funny response about how her use of social media was like a biologist studying mosquitoes: she is offering her flesh up for consumption to test it out for the future benefit of authors and twitterers.

She was lovely and far funnier than I had ever expected and her brilliance really shown. And when I got up to the front of the signing line, I had no idea what to say and just sort of quietly thanked her for coming.

I still can’t believe it happened.

Gaiman signing

Neil Gaiman

And then, adding to the list of Things I Never Imagined Possible, I got to meet Neil Gaiman.

Well, me and about 1,500 other people (seriously. That theater was PACKED).

Gaiman is on his last-ever book signing tour, for “The Ocean at the End of the Lane,” his newest book that is sort-of fiction, sort-of adult, sort-of magical. (I’m only a third of the way in, because I had to do things besides reading today and I’m very very upset about that, but I’ll be finished this weekend for sure).

Gaiman read to us from his new book, and I wanted his lovely sonorous English talking to go on forever, particularly when he tried on different British accents as appropriate.

I just read, tonight, the passage he’d read to us last night, and I hope it always stays this way, but I heard him again in my head, each syllable rolling around between my ears.

He then took some questions from the audience, and unlike Atwood they were all previously written down and presented to him on cards (and I’m bummed because I was stuck in the interminable line and did not get the chance to even ask a question via card). He joked that a huge stack of them were all “What was it like to work on Doctor Who?” so he’d removed those.

He only answered a few questions, and I admit I was a little disappointed; I wanted him to keep talking. But he was lovely and so kind and humble.

Then we got lucky, and he read from his next children’s book “Fortunately, The Milk.” It’s about a dad who has gone off to get milk for his children’s breakfast and…encounters some rather odd difficulty along the way. It was hilarious and I found myself leaning forward, forward in my seat trying to soak up more of it. He’s delightful. I’m definitely going to buy that one when it comes out in September!

And I was lucky enough to be seated in one of the nearer rows, so I didn’t have to wait too long to get my books signed.

Again, I got up there and just gaped like a goldfish. What do you say to your idol? I just almost-whispered “Thank you for coming out.” And he drew a heart in my book and I was so happy I had a Kristen Bell sloth moment as soon as we walked out. Seriously. Neil Gaiman made me cry.

 

So that’s been this month. I don’t know that I will ever be able to top that.

Provided you’re actually able to speak when given the moment (since I wasn’t), what would you say to your idol? And who would it be?

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Review: Tuesdays with Morrie

Tuesdays With MorrieTuesdays With Morrie by Mitch Albom

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Though I previously read The Five People You Meet in Heaven, I somehow managed to miss Albom’s smash hit “Tuesdays with Morrie” until this week, when a colleague mentioned it as reference material I scrambled for the library (all praise the mighty haven of books!).
It’s safe to say that Albom’s career as a novelist would not have happened had he taken a different class in college. “Tuesdays With Morrie” is the discussion of “big questions” with Professor Morrie Schwartz. Albom had been in Morrie’s class in college–had taken all of his classes, in fact–and, when he heard about Morrie’s terminal illness, he had gone to visit his favorite professor, 16 years after they’d last seen each other. Week by week, the pair discussed the big scary questions that plague everyone, and Morrie, having the unique perspective perhaps only the terminally ill can claim, acts as the Wise Seer; Albom, and the reader, the disciples traveling afar.
Albom is clearly a talented writer, carefully folding in each bit of information about Morrie’s past as it becomes relevant to the story, but Albom would undoubtedly be just another talented fast-moving sportswriter without Morrie.
The book is poetic, a comfortable bedside-table read if you want to dream about a life beyond the mundane. It’s full of things we should all already know, but because there are so many books telling us we’re living wrong, we must not be getting the message.
Aphorisms aside, this is a good book about a teacher and the impression he can have on the lives around him. Mark this down as “possible end-of-year teacher gift.” I think most people, but teachers in particular, would like to feel they had lived as inspiring a life as Morrie Schwartz.
In the meantime, sometimes the best we can do is read about it, and take a moment to think on our own dreams and goals.

View all my reviews

Leave a comment

Filed under Reviews

Writers’ Rates by Type of Publication

This is big, guys. I got to attend a lecture on the “Economics of Publishing” led by agent Evan Gregory while at DFWCon. His talk was great, but this one slide was earth-shaking for me. I think I’m still quivering.

I’ve had to replicate it, as the photo I took with my phone illustrates said shaking.

Royalties By Edition

Publisher Book Price Royalty Author Receives
Amazon, self-pub $2.99 $2.05
Nook, self-pub $2.99 1.76
Smashwords, self-pub $2.99 $1.49-1.74
Hardcover, traditional pub $25.00 $2.50-$3.75
e-book, traditional pub $7.99 $1.40
Trade paperback, traditional pub $14.99 $1.12
Paperback $7.99 $0.64-$0.80

That’s a estimated breakdown of what an author will get, per book sold, using different publishing options.

Pretty sobering, isn’t it?

Now, I realize some people are going to look at this and instantly cry foul and say self-publishing is definitely and always the right way to go, because there’s a big difference between $2.05 and $0.64. And I don’t disagree. But Mr. Gregory had an excellent point: sure, you get more per book, but you are likely to sell fewer–because you have only whatever marketing efforts you personally can generate, without help–and you have a lot more up-front costs, like editing and cover art, and a huge amount of your time, so while this compares the profits you stand to get, it doesn’t accurately reflect the time-and-money investments for each arrangement.

Still, knowledge is power, and learning this figures really changed my perspective.

4 Comments

Filed under Publishing